Update on the Wage Transparency Bill⚖️

Tessa

Justitia

Last week, the Advisory Division of the Council of State published its opinion on the bill to implement the European Directive on pay transparency between men and women.

To recap the rationale behind this directive: to increase transparency regarding pay and pay policies, and to make unjustified pay gaps between men and women more visible and easier to address. The bill includes provisions on access to pay criteria, employees’ requests for information, and reporting obligations for employers (with more than 100 employees). So there is work to be done.

The Council of State is critical of the feasibility of the proposal, particularly for employers. The advisory opinion emphasizes that the proposal imposes significant administrative burdens and additional obligations on employers.

Furthermore, the Council of State raises questions about the chosen implementation approach. For instance, the Division asks why the option of having the government centrally handle part of the payroll reporting was not utilized, as this could have potentially reduced the administrative burden on employers. It also requests further clarification on, among other things, the unfeasible implementation deadline of June 7, 2026, and whether this will affect the first reporting dates. In addition, privacy issues remain, and the Division recommends providing clarity on whether, and if so, how employers must include the compensation of non-binary individuals when complying with the proposal’s obligations.

The Council of State’s message is clear: the government will need to provide further justification and clarification on several points of this bill before the process can move forward. This is relevant for employers because the practical impact of this law is not yet fully determined or clear in all respects.

Employers would be wise to, at a minimum:

  • Adjust the hiring process where necessary: provide clarity on the salary range prior to the compensation discussion and stop asking about previous salary(ies);
  • Ensure that job profiles or descriptions are up to date;
  • Establish and/or review a job evaluation system. Determine which positions can be placed in the same category.
  • Place the categories on the salary scale and determine the ranges for those categories.
  • Check for any unjustified pay gaps between men and women in the same category and resolve these as much as possible.

Read the Council of State's opinion here. 

Do you have any questions about this bill? Please contact Dennis Oud, Tessa Sipkema, Elke Hofman-Bijvank, or Noa Bilogrevic.

Logo Haij Wende

De Haij & van der Wende

Lawyers
Dennis rond 200x200

Dennis Oud

Lawyer
Erwin rond 200x200

Erwin den Hartog

Corporate law, Real estate law
Fleur 1

Fleur Huisman

Environmental law
Petra lindhout pf

Petra Lindthout

Environmental law
Tessa rond 200x200

Tessa Sipkema

Employment law
Gerard rond 200x200

Gerard van der Wende

Administrative law and Family law
Elke 1

Elke Hofman-Bijvank

Employment law
Tim portret

Tim van Riel

Employment law
Iris portret

Iris Keemink

Lawyer
Noa Thumbnail

Noa Bilogrevic

Lawyer
Bekijk button

Possibly also of interest to you

Test news item

Please note that the content of our website (including any legal submissions) is for non-binding informational purposes only and does not serve as legal advice in the strict sense. The content of this site cannot and should not serve as a substitute for individual and binding legal advice relating to your specific situation. All information is therefore provided without guarantee of accuracy, completeness and timeliness.

Stay informed

Sign up for our newsletter